home security reviews

medical pendants

"Compulsory HIV testing and forced sterilization are counterproductive tothe Rwandan government's goal of improved reproductive health," said JoeAmon, health and human rights director at Human Rights Watch. "Provisions inthe current bill that increase stigma, rely on coercion, and denyindividuals their reproductive rights should be removed. " Human Rights Watch said that the reproductive health bill, drafted by theparliamentary committee whose duties include promoting social welfare,contains three particularly troublesome provisions related to HIV/AIDStesting. First it provides that all individuals who plan to marry mustundergo HIV testing and provide a certificate beforehand. Second, marriedindividuals are required to be tested for HIV/AIDS upon the request of theirspouses. Third, if a physician finds it "necessary" for a child or anincapacitated person to be tested for HIV/AIDS, he or she may conduct thetest without seeking consent and may show the result to the parent,guardian, or care provider. Ensuring that all HIV testing is confidential, conducted with informedconsent, and accompanied by counseling is widely recognized as integral toeffective HIV prevention and treatment strategies. Mandatory HIV testing anddisclosure have been condemned by the Joint United Nations Programme onHIV/AIDS, the World Health Organization, and the UN's Office of the HighCommissioner of Human Rights as violations of the right to privacy andcounterproductive to effective HIV/AIDS control. These organizations have also stated that mandatory testing and compulsorydisclosure can put women at increased risk of abuse and undermine publictrust in the health care system. Research by Human Rights Watch on HIVtesting has documented significant abuses associated with coercive testingprograms. The proposed bill also obligates the Rwandan Government "to suspendfertility for mentally handicapped people.

Posted by Anonymous at 3:19PM | (8 comments)

alarm system home

Always remember to call a local security company instead to do it by your self, that will cost you more money at the end if Insurance company find the owner did it by it self, is like running a cable from a main electrical panel to a washer machine you want to install in some area where you don’t have an electrical outlet. If this start a fire later on and if the authorities found the installation in that outlet was wrong and cause the fire, the investigation will end on you will pay because to fix your home because you did it by your self, thinking you know it is easy and any one can do it, plus you will pay to the town because you did some thing with knowing the electrical code. the alarm system codes are the same and the reason a License for alarm system installation is required in most states is because you need to know what you are doing and how, more if this is for save life’s or keep the bad people outside your properties. A local security company will give you a better understanding of what you need, the extra $200 you may pay with a security copany is value if they are the ones who will handle you a 1 year warranty and if you have any issue after that they will be there. Keep in mind the license is because the F. B. I check background and they pass the state test to be installers. You hqve a good point here. For security cameras yes anyone can do it. For alarm systems where is involved lives, I am 100% people we love to know every thing works fine and it will be working agter is installed it, also people forgot the liability point of view of insurance. If you install by your self a new set of brakes in your vehicle to save some dollars and you got an accident and the accident was on investigations and show at the end it was because you forget to place the safetu device and the insurance found this issue and ask where you do your breaks so we can go and claim every thing we are paying to you…you will say, I did it by my self.

Posted by Anonymous at 3:19PM | (8 comments)